Efforts to drive domestic demand growth, substitute imports and achieve technological self-sufficiency should inform investment decisions and opportunities in China in coming years. This has implications for other economies in the region. We believe they, and companies catering to Chinese demand, should be favoured by investors in the post-pandemic world.
China sees itself driving Asian growth
The pandemic has hurt Asia’s external-oriented economies badly. However, China’s ‘dual circulation’ policy can act as a backstop for regional growth, lessening the impact of the COVID shock and rising protectionism.
China sees itself moving into a new paradigm where the global system would be divided into three main regions: Asia, North America and Europe, with each region being led by a super-regional power.
This will likely lead to the rise of regionalism with strong intra-regional economic linkages against a background of de-globalisation. More crucially, China sees itself at the centre of Asia, engaging regional and global capital, financial and technological markets to enhance domestic and regional growth.
Regionalism versus de-globalisation
The effects of China’s strategy for Asia are already reflected in its growing trade relationship with ASEAN. The bloc surpassed North America in late 2019 as China’s second largest trading partner after Europe (see exhibit 1).
This boom not only underscores the huge potential of economic linkage between the two sides, but also reflects how their cooperation continued through the pandemic despite shrinking global demand and spreading protectionism.
The recently concluded Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), which is led by China, looks set to be a common platform for regional cooperation, though it may not be a game changer in the short term.
At a regional level, China seeks to cooperate with ASEAN in the digital economy. It also aims to promote its ‘Health Silk Road’ initiative by establishing a China-ASEAN public-health cooperation mechanism to fight COVID-19. Beijing is also encouraging Chinese companies to continue to invest in ASEAN.
To address geopolitical concerns, especially in the South China Sea, Beijing is seeking regular dialogue with regional governments and trying to speed the negotiations on a code of conduct in the region and on maritime cooperation.
We believe the most important risk to emerging markets, including Asian emerging markets, is Beijing tightening policy prematurely. Disappointing growth as China pursues its deleveraging efforts too aggressively is a further risk, but not an imminent one.
In our view, the odds of such outcomes are low at this point given Beijing’s flexible approach to policy in order to balance growth and debt reduction.
- China’s opportunities and challenges in 2021 and beyond
- China’s SOE debt defaults: Don’t panic
- more articles on China
Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice.
The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns.
Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions). Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.