The Indian government’s greater focus on affordable housing adds a building block to the economy’s recovery, contributing to a revival of investment and providing steady support for home building, especially after the government’s demonetisation push hit demand for high-end residential real estate.
The 'Housing for All' programme, awarded a 40% higher budget allocation of INR 290 billion in the budget for the year to March 2018, brings another benefit too. It contributes to solving the challenge of creating at least 10 million non-agricultural jobs a year to address the increase in the working-age population. The construction activity generated could employ an additional 1.5-2 million people each year.
What is India's 'Housing for All' progamme ?
Housing for All, also known under the abbreviation PMAY, is a government scheme launched in June 2015 to bridge India’s low-cost housing shortfall. The plan is to build 50 million dwellings over five years – 20 million in towns and 30 million in rural areas. Housing for All is designed to cover the average cost of USD 5 000 for a rural house and USD 20 000 for a city dwelling (see Exhibit 1 below).
Exhibit 1: The Indian government has given a significant financial boost to the affordable homes scheme
1)RE: revised estimates (2)BE: budget estimates (3) compound annual growth rate
Source: Government budget documents, CLSA, as of March 2017
By November 2016, the government had already approved the building of 1.3 million urban home at a total cost of some INR 700 billion, almost matching the 1.4 million city dwellings authorised for construction over the previous 10 years. The greater autonomy of India’s states has facilitated successful execution. They can run their own projects and improve state-level construction laws.
How does 'Housing for All' work?
To achieve its goal to provide a roof over everyone’s head, the government put in place a system involving up-front subsidies run through four different schemes. The credit-linked subsidy scheme (CLSS) is the most popular of these and has proved attractive to financiers and low-cost property developers due to its efficiency. The CLSS is designed to facilitate home loans for eligible low-income citizens to either buy or build a house by providing an interest subsidy which is paid deposited into bank accounts.
A boon for the housing finance and cement sectors
The rise in Housing for All-led construction activity is expected to lead to an increase in annual cement demand of 8%-10%, or 25-30 million tonnes, and lift mortgage demand in a country with a low mortgage penetration rate of 9%. This compares with 32% in Malaysia (see exhibit 2 below).
The demonetisation move might also boost the mortgage penetration rate, particularly in the real-estate sector, where between 35% and 40% of sales are transacted in cash.
Exhibit 2: Mortgage financing in India should get a boost from the affordable homes scheme (the graph shows mortgage financing in India and other countries as a percentage of GDP)
A building block on the path towards recovery
While the Housing for All programme may not on its own be enough to revive investment activity in the Indian economy, it is expected to provide steady support for construction activity, especially since demonetisation has hit demand for high-end residential real estate.
Furthermore, to address the increase in its working-age population, India needs to create at least 10 million non-agricultural jobs a year. In that regard, Housing for All could contribute to solving India’s job creation challenge, as the increased construction activity it generates could employ an additional 1.5-2 million people each year.
Written on 7 April 2017
The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay.
Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher than average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity, or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions).
Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, portfolio transaction, liquidation and custody services for funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.