Looking at the Wall Street saying, “As January goes, so goes the year”, what can it tell us about the latest US retail sales data? What does that expression even mean? I don’t think anyone knows what it means, but it is provocative. It’s not even particularly enlightening because you only have to think back to January 2016. Globally risk assets were under pressure from a number of catalysts and in fact the S&P500, considered the global risk barometer, ended the month of January 2016 down 5%. Many had thought 2016 was setting up to be a dire year for the US consumer and asset class returns. But January did not foretell the coming year’s performance as the S&P finished 2016 up nearly 12% and the US consumer remained resilient. Perhaps we should update this tagline with something more specific that better represents an accurate statement – “As goes the health of the consumer, so goes retail sales”.
December 2016 US retail sales came in softer than expected
In the last few months of 2016 consumer confidence surged and all signs were pointing towards a bumper holiday sales season for retailers. Over the last few months and quarters we’ve seen the consumer retail sector come under pressure with a series of negative data points and fourth quarter updates from retailers (i.e. Macy’s, Kohl’s, Limited Brands, Sears, Neiman Marcus). So suffice to say the US retail sector needed a robust consumer to spend in December. Unfortunately when the December US retail sales report was released on 13/01/17 the data came in softer than expected. On a positive note, US retail sales were up 0.6% month-overmonth led by gains in autos and gasoline. However the closely watched, Control Group (retail sales less food, auto dealers, building materials, gas stations) (see Exhibit 1 below) was up a paltry 0.2% month-over-month or 3.3% year-over-year. Spending at restaurants (an indicator of discretionary spending) fell by 0.8% month-over-month after a 1.2% rise in November.
Exhibit 1: Changes in core US retail sales, year-on-year % between April 2000 and December 2016 (‘core sales data excludes food, car, building materials and petrol sales on account of their volatility)
E-commerce came out on top
So while the reported US retail sales numbers were at best mixed and at worst disappointing, one underlying story continued on course: the secular headwinds of declining brick-and-mortar (mall) traffic at the expense of e-commerce. Exhibit 2 (below) shows the persistent trend for consumers to shop on their couch rather than brave Mother Nature and venture out to the store. Sears announced earlier this month it was closing 150 stores in an attempt to right size its business model. But for every casualty there is a success story and it is one most everyone has heard of, Amazon.com. For years Amazon has been carefully sculpting itself into the go-to place for couch surfing and impulse buying of nearly every product imaginable. And as Amazon gained market share it caught the eye of the US bellwether brick-and-mortar, Wal-Mart.
Exhibit 2: US retail sales: a persistent trend for consumers to shop online at home, on their couch, rathering than venturing out to the store – the graph show the category percentage of ‘clicks over bricks’ sales between April 2000 and December 2016
Source: Bloomberg, BNP Paribas Asset Management; as of 17 January 2017
Wal-Mart spent years attempting to build its own online presence with limited success relative to the Amazon model. So in 2016 Wal-Mart entered two noticeable transactions to address where it sees the market heading. In June it sold its Chinese e-commerce business to JD.com, in exchange for a 5% stake in the company. Then in August it acquired Jet.com, the fast growing US online retailer. And, just last week, Wal-Mart acquired online footwear retailer ShoeBuy.com to further strengthen its online offerings.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to be used for online food shopping in select markets
So as Wal-Mart pivots its business model to facilitate more online transactions, Amazon looks to increase its market share in an area which until recently had been dominated by companies like Wal-Mart. In 2014 the US Farm Bill mandated a feasibility test be conducted on the implications of allowing online retail food stores to accept SNAP benefits (formerly referred to as food stamps). Earlier this month the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) announced a select group of online retailers would participate in this study. This group was comprised of established brick-and-mortar grocery stores and Amazon. Interestingly Wal-Mart was not one of the eligible participants.
Last year the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) funded USD 74 billion in SNAP benefits. A study released last week by the USDA found the number one item in the shopping carts of SNAP beneficiaries was soft drinks at roughly 9.3% (about USD 6.9 billion). Non SNAP-eligible households spent on average 7.1% on carbonated beverages. It is important to note that this is only a feasibility test and any advance conclusions should be tempered. But the potential benefit of greater access to healthier food for SNAP beneficiaries, particularly those in ‘food deserts’, is a clear positive. And for Amazon, which last reported annual revenues of roughly USD 128 billion, it marks a clear opportunity to continue expanding its online distribution.