This time, it may be for real. While we certainly do not belittle the risk to the economy from future coronavirus variants, the pattern with Delta and Omicron has been that the economic impact of each new strain has been progressively less negative.
At the same time, the messaging from the US Federal Reserve on its monetary policy stance has clearly changed.
Whereas last year, the central bank’s view was that higher inflation would prove transitory, it has become increasingly clear that at least some of the price pressures will persist. While Covid may be fading (slowly) as a macroeconomic factor, the supply chain disruptions will likely linger.
More importantly, the US labour market appears to be near full employment, meaning that recent wage gains could last for longer. To the degree that the Fed is behind the curve in terms of tackling inflation, we believe the risk now is that the bank raises its policy rate by even more than the market already expects (see Exhibit 1).
US labour market – In better shape than it may look
Many observers viewed the latest US non-farm payrolls report as disappointing. Only 199 000 jobs were created in December versus a consensus forecast of 400 000. The disappointment, though, was more due to overly optimistic expectations than to a surprising slowdown in job growth.
It is important to recognise the surge in Covid infections that occurred during the month (and which has worsened since). Whenever this has happened in the last two years, job growth has slowed sharply. This has been the case particularly in those industries sensitive to lockdown restrictions or people’s nervousness when the risk of infection appeared to be high. As the Omicron wave passes, we expect job growth to rebound.
Other indicators suggest the labour market is in fact quite strong. Even though the participation rate edged up in December (although not among older workers), the unemployment rate fell, meaning a greater share of those people re-entering the labour force found jobs.
This offsets some of the pessimism around the high ‘quits’ rate that reflects the number of people who are voluntarily leaving their job. This ‘great resignation’ is a positive sign of the dynamism of the US labour market.
We all appreciate that society and the economy will in many ways be fundamentally different in the future due to the pandemic. That means the labour market needs to be reconfigured. So many people quitting (and presumably taking new, better jobs), suggests this reconfiguration is happening quickly (and in contrast to Europe, where stability comes at the cost of economic dynamism).
Market segments benefiting from higher rates
Strong consumer and business demand combined with lingering supply chain constraints and a smaller labour force are the factors driving inflation to higher, sustained levels.
At a minimum, US monetary does not need to be accommodative (as it is today). A return to even a neutral policy rate would still imply real yields that are perhaps 75-100bp higher than they are today.
The potential impact of such an increase is already evident in the market moves over the course of the real yield sell-off this month. Indices with a positive sensitivity to higher rates such as those for value stocks and commodities have outperformed, while assets at risk from higher rates such as technology stocks have lagged sharply (see Exhibit 2).
Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. This document does not constitute investment advice.
The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns.
Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions). Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.